WORLD CROWNS Mexico - Cap and Rays 8 Reales 1824 to 1897
Counterfeit 8 Reales
In the 20 + years of collecting this
series, I had become aware of a handful of counterfeits, including the
piece below,
which I now learn from a scholar of the subject was identified in an 1845 monograph as Riddell # 215.
The broad variety of counterfeits in this series runs the gamut in terms of design, composition and place of origin including:
- Base metal and debased silver coins struck for a profit in Mexico or elsewhere;
- “Full” composition struck in the United States for Oriental trade;
- Dies fabricated from “official” elements, such as the eagle;
- Dies which “escaped” from the mint with a complete date;
- Dies which “escaped”
from the mint the three digits, the fourth being added by the
counterfeiter;
- Coins made in Mexico;
- Coins made in the United States.
John Leonard Riddell (Riddell # 237) in his 1845 work “A
Monograph of the Silver Dollar,: Good and Bad.
Illustrated with
Facsimile Figures", identified hundreds of counterfeit 8 reales pieces. A minute sampling
appears herein.. This work was reprinted in the 1960s
The information on this page appears
courtesy of a scholar of the subject of counterfeit coinage.
Riddell # 415.
This piece, now in a study collection. is an
identical die match for the Riddell # 215. It is slightly lighter
in weight than Riddell's specimen
- this one is 26.7 grams and his was 27.0 grams.
Riddell's specimen was 0.255 fine silver, this piece may be closer to pure copper based on its appearance.
This piece shows details that are not
visible on the Riddell plate like the star in front of the denomination
and
some of the buttons on the individual cactus pads.
It also clearly shows how the die was cut to
apply the feathers to the eagle. The feathers were applied by using a
drill or a round punch.

Riddell # 221 (below)
This piece, now in a study collection. is an identical die match for
the Riddell # 221, a member of the the "broken toe"
family of counterfeit coins. Riddel quoted a 0.063 % silver
content. This piece appears to have possibly be re-plated to
pass a second time, perhaps by a banker or merchant that didn't want to be stiffed?
This family of forgeies traces to the northeast US. There is no agreement on the exact location of manufacture.
Dies for one of these coins were reported to have been found in the estate of an Attleborough, Mass jewler.
An astounding number of examples found in New England or that trace back to New England or members of this
family is truly astounding seem to confiirm the New England origin. The only factor working against the NE origin
is that Riddell in New Orleans also reports the forgery as extremely common.

Riddell # 237
This piece dated 1834 Zs MO was in my collection for years, presumed
genuine. I now have it on good authority that this piece
was identified
by John Leonard Riddell (Riddell # 237) in his 1845 work “A
Monograph of the Silver Dollar,: Good and Bad.
Illustrated with
Facsimile Figures”.
