|
The premiums placed on counter-stamps motivates the creation of spurious
counterstamps. This temptation is magnified with the advent of eBay, where the value of a common coin can be multiplied by the application of a counterstamp. When considering whether a given mark is authentic, there is no hard and fast rule. In the early 1960s, I assisted as my father picked though over a million circulating Morgan dollars he had obtained from banks. (In most cases, these bags had been sealed decades earlier. We found many rarities including multiple1893-S, 1894 P, 1903-O, 1898-O (then QUITE rare!), even an 1895-P!. Yet we did not encounter a single counterstamped piece. Based on this survey, very few counterstamped Morgan dollars could have been created and returned to banks before the early 20th century. Pieces may have been stamped somewhat later (e.g. N.S. & Co.) and/or maintained as pocket pieces and/or rejected as "mutilated". |
| Exampes of Better Documented
Stamps |
|
| Maurice M. Gould is recocgnized as a pioneer in the
field. He
collected and catalogued these pieces when there was little motive to
"fake" a piece, which likely would have been considered
mutilated. He identified some of the "classic" pieces, such as Polhemus, Sage Candy Coin, Houck's Panacea, etc, in a number of articles, 1947, 1957, 1962 & 1967. An issuer identified by Gould (1) would be considered original by the toughest of judges. (Of course, the recognized stamps can be faked ! See Featuring Fakes - Do you have the original ? Virgil Hancock The Numismatist Feb 1971 |
|
Gregory Brunk expanded on Maurice M. Gould's work. Dr. Brunk, in addition to buying a number of Gould's pieces was collecting at a time when many of these pieces might be found in a dealer's "junk" box. Again, a piece illustrated by Brunk was probably created for a "legitimate" purpose, i.e. other than to fool collectors. Rulau, whose work was broader, encompassing al Merhant's tokens, also included counterstamps, which are generally considered genuine. Some of the more "common" pieces, are more likely to be genuine. For example, "EC Beardsely", though a "maverick" is documented on 2 seated quarters , 4 seated halves and one foreign coin, a Prussia Vereinsthaler, 1865-A, Y-170a. The 1879 Morgan Dollar illustrated as by Brunk B29390 is now in my colletion as well as two other pieces, an 1884 and 1886-O. Close comparison indicates that these are from an identical stamp. Another example of a "common" piece, which ws collected by Brunk and illlustrated in the 2006 sale of his collection is "N.S. & Co." which the cataloge attributed to Nate Snellenberg & Co. a Philadelphia store which was in business until the 1960's. The Brunk collection piece is dated 1880. You can see subtle diferences that result from the stamp application by overalying the Brunk piece with the examples I have on 1878 and 1890-O dollars. |
| QUESTIONABLE
COUNTERSTAMPS |
|
THE classic example of a counterstamp made to fool the numismatic community is the “8 BITS” / “TEXAS” stamps which appeared in the 1950's, supposedly originating a century earlier in the Republic of Texas. (Bruce X 18). The perpetrator of this mark “sacrificed” a 1795 flowing hair dollar to bolster the story. |
|
|
This illustration from my collection: The "undertype' piece was manufactured by soldering together an 1898 obverse with a New Orleans mint reverse. Obviously this was done at a time when the 1898-O was considered a rarirty. (See June 1962 ad.) The fake 1898-O dollar was apparently counterstamped to detract from the fraud. |
|
In March 2007 a major auction house, unable to verify the authenticity of a good number of counterstamps, withdrew them from auction after publishing the catalog. The sale included "classic" stamps, (presumed genuine) such as Sage Candy Coin, Phillip's Cheap Store, Polhemus, Parisian Varieties and countermarked Stone Mounatin commemorative halves. Forty out of sixty lots were withdrawn when the catalogers could not satsify themselves as to the authenticity of the pieces, including also: 1872 Seated Dollar stamped T.P. BARBER Morgan Dollar stamped L.C. CALDWELL Morgan Dollar stamped W.E. CHAPMAN Maximilian peso stamped NEWELL France 5 Francs, l'An 9 stamped C.H. CHESLEY Also withdrawn was this piece, ascribed to a 19th-century San Francisco saloon. The lot was accompanied by a contemporary advertisement. |
![]() |
The example on the right was listed by a major auction house as: Scotland. Countermarked Dollar, ND (1811) "Questionable Counterstamp, Sold As is", enclosed in a PCGS Holder, graded AU 55. (Hopefully authenticating the coin and not the stamp) The style just looks wrong to me - compare "Lanarck Mills" and other stamps. The lettering style looks wrong and conflicts with the apparent care that was taken in forming the stamp and prserving it for 200 years. I would agree with the seller who labeled "questionable"! Goldberg Coins & Collectibles May 29, 2007 Lot 3576 est $1,500 - $2,000 - WITHDRAWN !! after spirited mail bidding. |